Anthropic Gives Vetted Defenders Fewer Claude Guardrails
Bonjour,
J’ai créé un sondage sur framadate il y a quelques jours. Tout fonctionnait à merveille jusqu’à ce que des votes disparaissent de mon sondage, mais pas tous. Pourtant, je vois bien depuis mon sondage les notifications de celles et ceux qui ont participé.
Par ailleurs, mes options de dates ont été modifiées voir supprimées. Or, selon l’option que j’ai choisie, aucun votant n’est en mesure de modifier les votes des autres donc logiquement, ils n’ont pas pu modifier le sondage par inadvertance.
Merci d’avance pour votre aide à résoudre ce mystère !
Savannah
3 messages - 3 participant(e)s
Bonjour,
serait-il possible de conserver l’ordre chronologique des nouvelles dates de manifestations ajoutées postérieurement ?
Merci
A teenager from Amman, Jordan suspected of leading the prolific data theft and extortion group ShinyHunters has been detained and is reportedly cooperating with the FBI to identify other members of the hacking gang. KrebsOnSecurity has learned that the suspect, who uses the hacker handle “Rey,” was detained as ShinyHunters was in the process of extorting a business unit recently divested by the global aerospace company Boeing, which manufactures the fleet of planes used by the employer of Rey’s father — Royal Jordanian Airlines.

The logo for Jeppesen ForeFlight, a business unit divested last year by the aerospace firm Boeing.
On October 3, Reuters cited three unnamed sources saying a suspected ShinyHunters member in Amman named Saif Al-din Khader was detained by Jordanian authorities and was cooperating with the FBI. KrebsOnSecurity identified Rey as Khader in a November 2025 profile, in which the young man admitted working with multiple ransomware groups.
Rey was featured again in a September 28 exclusive about the Dutch police arresting 24-year-old convicted cybercriminal Pepijn van der Stap on suspicion of aiding in data thefts and extortions by ShinyHunters. The story noted that immediately following the Dutchman’s arrest on the evening of September 15, Rey assumed control over the ShinyHunters brand and boasted publicly about stealing highly sensitive data from the FBI and extorting the ransomware group Cl0p.
Rey taunted both the FBI and Cl0p with memes posted to his longtime account on Twitter/X, while simultaneously including images of the avatar used by Van Der Stap’s former hacker alias “Umbreon” in an apparent attempt to frame the Dutchman for both hacks.

A taunting meme uploaded to Twitter/X by Rey on Sept. 22. A giant sized version of the Pokemon character Umbreon can be seen in the bottom left.
As noted in our September 28 report, ShinyHunters gained access to the FBI site and other victims by exploiting a vulnerability (CVE-2026-35273) in PeopleSoft, a software-as-a-service platform from the tech giant Oracle that is broadly used by companies to manage hiring and human resources, benefits and payroll. Oracle quickly issued a fix for CVE-2026-35273, which ShinyHunters first began exploiting as a zero-day in June, and at the time Mandiant released web application firewall rules intended for organizations that couldn’t apply the security update quickly enough.
ShinyHunters told BleepingComputer in June that the original goal behind exploiting the PeopleSoft vulnerability was to breach the FBI’s own PeopleSoft database, but the hackers said those attacks were unsuccessful for some reason. In recent weeks, however, ShinyHunters turned to a well-known URL-encoding trick to bypass Mandiant’s suggested web application firewall rules.
In a report released Sept. 25, security experts at Mandiant and the Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) confirmed that ShinyHunters had mass-exploited the PeopleSoft vulnerability to steal data from dozens of systems across a range of industries, including higher education, technology, healthcare, agriculture, transportation and government.
Reuters reported October 5 that the FBI has removed a contractor at Accenture over their failure to patch the FBI recruitment website hacked by ShinyHunters, which exposed sensitive data on more than 5,000 FBI personnel, including each’s person’s unit and specialization, as well as medical and psychiatric records.
According to two sources familiar with the ShinyHunters investigation, a navigation and digital aviation unit recently divested by the global aerospace company Boeing was among the victims that ShinyHunters was in the process of extorting when Rey was apprehended by Jordanian authorities.
Those sources said the FBI’s investigation into ShinyHunters gained renewed urgency with the group’s attempted extortion of the former Boeing unit, which allegedly included the theft of sensitive information that sources said could pose operational safety and security risks.
In a brief statement shared with KrebsOnSecurity, Boeing acknowledged the extortion attempts by ShinyHunters, and said the incident concerned data stolen from Jeppesen ForeFlight, a subsidiary that Boeing sold in November 2025 to the private equity firm Thoma Bravo for $10.55 billion.
“We are aware of claims by a threat actor regarding data allegedly associated with Boeing and our former subsidiary Jeppesen ForeFlight,” a Boeing spokesperson shared. “We are actively reviewing the matter with the Jeppesen ForeFlight team.”
A spokesperson for Jeppesen ForeFlight shared a written statement in response to questions, saying the company has seen no impact on their end. “Based on our investigation to date into this claim and proactive security posture, there was no impact to our operations or products.”
Rey’s alleged involvement in attempting to extort the former Boeing unit is noteworthy because there is strong evidence that his father works for Royal Jordanian Airlines, which is mostly controlled by the Jordanian government and operates its long-haul fleet on passenger planes built by Boeing. Rey claimed on Telegram in early 2025 that his father was an airline pilot, although that could not be independently confirmed.
However, as noted in our November 2025 profile of Rey, his family’s shared computer was at one point compromised by password-stealing malware, and the data collected by that malware clearly shows Rey’s father used the same credentials to log in at multiple online portals for Royal Jordanian Airlines employees.
Royal Jordanian Airlines has not yet responded to a request for comment. In advance of our September 28 story, KrebsOnSecurity once again emailed Rey’s father to seek comment and update him on his son’s alleged activities. Neither of the Khaders have responded. But just hours after that request was sent, Rey began deleting his various social media accounts, including the Twitter/X account he previously used to taunt the FBI, Cl0p, and other ShinyHunters victims.
Rey may have nixed many of his social media profiles, but his cybersecurity blog on GitHub somehow escaped the purge, and it shows that Rey was fixated on the leaders of the Cl0p ransomware group. In March 2026, Rey’s blog featured a lengthy post that identified two Russian men as the core developers and hackers behind Cl0p.

Rey’s blog on GitHub. This post doxes two Russian men as the core operators behind Cl0p, one of the oldest and most established ransomware groups still in operation today.
Meanwhile, news outlets in the Netherlands reported explosive new allegations leveled at Van der Stap, whose supposed personal transformation from convicted to reformed hacker has been widely covered in the tech news media. The Dutch daily RTL reported on Sept. 29 that investigators suspect Van der Stap tried to orchestrate at least two murders. According to RTL, the murders were allegedly to be committed abroad, and there are indications Van der Stap gave the order for these attacks.
Van der Stap was released from prison after serving the better part of a four year sentence for data theft and extortion activity that prosecutors said netted between €1.5 million and €2.7 million. In an interview with KrebsOnSecurity on September 9, Van der Stap described his new role as “offensive security lead” at the Dutch cybersecurity company Neo Security, saying the job involved probing client networks for security vulnerabilities.
Neo Security’s owner Benjamin Korper told Reuters he has hired an outside firm to investigate whether Van der Stap had hacked Neo Security or its customers, but that so far investigators have found no evidence he acted against his employer or clients. Korper said Dutch forensic investigators visited his office on September 15, the night Van der Stap was arrested in a dramatic police raid that reportedly involved flash bang grenades.

A screenshot of a Sept 16 story by the Dutch news outlet at5.nl, describing a police raid on Van Der Stap’s residence that reportedly used flash-bang grenades.
Prior to his first arrest in 2023, Van der Stap was working as a software engineer at the Amsterdam-based cybersecurity startup Hadrian, while volunteering at the Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure (DIVD) — even as he was hacking into and extorting a number of large organizations.
When asked in a recent interview why anyone should believe the word of a self-described “reformed” cybercriminal who had so casually deceived countless friends, co-workers and journalists for years, Van der Stap replied that his work spoke for itself and there was nothing he could say that would convince his worst critics.
“You can throw a bunch of nice words at someone, but you can’t convince them if they don’t want to be convinced,” Van der Stap told KrebsOnSecurity on Sept. 9. “I’m doing what I can to repay victims, and that’s all I can do. If someone doesn’t want to believe me, then that’s on them.”
Cybercriminals aligned with ShinyHunters have been responsible for dozens of data breaches involving billions of stolen records, and breaches claimed by the group stretch back to at least 2019. But experts say the people recently operating behind the ShinyHunters name are not the same core members that populated the group in its early days, most of whom are French citizens who have been arrested (if not also imprisoned) on at least one prior occasion for alleged cybercrime activity.
More to the point, ShinyHunters has become something of a franchise. Think the Dread Pirate Roberts character in the 1980s cult movie classic “The Princess Bride,” only succession by death is replaced with succession by arrest, and there can be multiple simultaneous Dread Pirate Robertses. Sources close to the investigation say the FBI is focusing on a remaining handful of cybercriminal freelancers or affiliates who have been feeding the group stolen credentials to various software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms used by major companies in exchange for a cut of any data ransoms later paid by victims.
In the days after the news broke of Van der Stap’s arrest, a cybercrime-focused chat server on Telegram that was allegedly operated by Rey erupted with hot takes, with most participants heaping ridicule on the teenage hacker after he publicly backed down from threats against the FBI and Cl0p, and again when the ShinyHunters’s darknet website suddenly went offline. Several commentators accused Rey of resurrecting the ShinyHunters brand after its core members were rounded up in France, and making a mockery of the group’s name and reputation ever since.
“He bought the old forum PGP key and used it to make new Breachforum websites and Telegram channels larping as ShinyHunters to ransom companies and then sell the used data or resell his forum when he goes broke,” one member recounted.
A relatively new Telegram channel called “The Battle” has been doxing and needling Rey and other alleged ShinyHunters members for several weeks, and it has gained a considerable readership among the cybercrime communities operating on Telegram. One of the coordinators of that harassment campaign repeatedly portrayed Rey as clueless greenhorn who sought to ride the coattails of a cybercriminal brand that has long enjoyed a reputation for ruthlessly selling or publishing data stolen from victim companies who refuse to give in to extortion demands.
“Rey (Saif Al-Din Khader) made a serious mistake when he started pretending to be a member of ShinyHunters,” wrote the administrators of The Battle server on Telegram. “That group had already been dismantled, with many of its members either arrested or imprisoned, yet Rey still chose to use its name while carrying out his crimes. We’re aware of claims that [Rey] caused over $200 million in damages and helped around 5–6 friend groups in the community make money by using Shiny Hunters group aliases to negotiate deals for a 25–30% cut over the past few months.”
In an interview with The Register, ShinyHunters claimed they hacked the FBI to counter the agency’s narrative in a May 2026 alert that advised victims against paying a ransom to the group, which came off looking unprofessional and capricious in the FBI’s advisory.

A flash notice on ShinyHunters released by the FBI on May 15, 2026.
The public notice warned the group has been known to pursue a number of different victim harassment strategies, from sending threatening text messages and phone calls to victims and their family members to in some cases swatting victims. The FBI warned ShinyHunters members “may also falsely claim to have sensitive or compromising information, including embarrassing photographs or videos of victims, which frequently do not exist.”
The hackers told The Register their attack on the FBI “demonstrated our technical capabilities and directly refuted the misinformation disseminated by the FBI, journalists, and industry researchers.” At the same time, the group’s leaders seemed to acknowledge that the FBI’s warning materially harmed their prospects for convincing victims to pay, saying “this was fundamentally a public relations and marketing initiative for our business.”
Bonjour,
Je construis un questionnaire de recherche à l’aide de Framaforms et j’essaie de reporter une réponse donnée dans une question dans le texte d’une autre question. Plus précisément. Une première question demande aux personnes de donner des mots. J’aimerais que ces mots soient rappelés dans une autre question, où la personne devra les évaluer sur une échelle.
Pour faire cela, j’utilise les token du type [webform_submission:values:key]. J’ai vérifié les clés. J’ai bien ajouté un saut de page entre la question source et la question cible.
Pourtant, le mot visé par le token n’apparait pas (à part dans les champs « balisage »), ni dans un titre de question, ni dans les options de réponse. A la place, il y a un espace vide.
Avez-vous des pistes de solution ? Merci d’avance ![]()
1 message - 1 participant(e)

For about a year, Austin Davis’ phone has been flooded with hundreds of pleas for help from across the Phoenix metropolitan area.
A school employee wanted to help a homeless family but couldn’t find space at a shelter. Could Davis pay for a hotel room?
A mother of five living in a storage unit contacted a homeless services organization for help. They told her to call Davis.
A mother panhandling with her six children said passersby gave her Davis’ phone number, telling her he might be able to provide shelter. “I feel like the worst mother in the world,” she texted him.
Nearly every person who’s reached out to Davis, a 26-year-old poet and advocate for homeless people, says they’d first called 211, seeking help through the official channel, only to learn it could be months before they’d get shelter or a housing placement. His phone has become the unofficial hotline for emergency shelter.
Caseworkers, teachers, social workers, police and hospital workers have called and texted to see if Davis can help people without a place to go. Even workers from the official channel — 211 and the Family Housing Hub — have sent people to him.
Davis’ path to becoming the de facto advocate of last resort illustrates how the system set up to care for families who are homeless in Maricopa County is failing them. ProPublica found that calling and visiting the official channel to address family homelessness rarely leads to offers of help, leaving families feeling hopeless.


In January, I started coming to Tempe’s Moeur Park, known as “The Hill,” to meet the families Davis was assisting. I was struck by the scene of desperate parents, some of whom had recently been evicted, lost a job or fled domestic violence, surrounding Davis to tell him about their situation. As he listened, he played with their children, always with an energy drink in hand.
The scene was both heartening and disconcerting. Davis was helping families stay off the street, which was good. But why, I wondered, in a county of nearly 5 million people, was a man in a park their best chance at getting help? And why were government agencies and multimillion-dollar nonprofits, some tasked with helping the very same homeless families, sending people to him?
Davis, who runs a small nonprofit called AZ Hugs, is known for working outside the system. With the help of volunteers, he hosts a nightly meal for homeless people at a suburban Phoenix park. This has drawn the ire of Tempe officials and led to 35 citations against him for trespassing and holding picnics without permits. (In 2024, he reached a deal to plead guilty to one permit violation, and the city dismissed the other citations, according to court documents. He’s spent three nights in jail.) In 2025, Davis and two other advocates for homeless people filed a lawsuit against Tempe, alleging it had violated their free speech protections by citing them for feeding people in parks. The city revised its permit ordinance, and Davis withdrew the lawsuit.
In recent months, he has tried to draw attention to what he calls the “family homelessness crisis,” raising money on social media to pay for hotel rooms for families, many with young children, who would otherwise sleep on the street or in their cars. Davis said he cannot assist everyone who asks for help. A much bigger effort is needed, he added, involving nonprofits and local and state officials, but he sees little evidence that it’s happening.
The number of people in homeless families in Maricopa County reached 2,103 this year, its highest level since 2015, according to the latest figures that are compiled locally and reported to the federal government. And those numbers are considered an undercount because the tally is taken on a single night by volunteers who can miss people who are trying to stay out of sight. In late September, nearly 200 families were on the waitlist for shelter in the county. It doesn’t include those who couldn’t get on; were kicked off because they weren’t considered homeless; or those who called 211, found it unhelpful and never called back. (Solari, a nonprofit that runs the statewide 211 line, said that the Family Housing Hub, which is run by UMOM, a nonprofit, sets the eligibility criteria for placement on the shelter waitlist.)
I spoke to more than 30 families searching for shelter. Parents told me they worried how their situation was affecting their children. Research shows homelessness harms children, disrupting brain development and growth and leading to permanent changes in the brain and body.

Candice Ortiz had tried since spring to find stable shelter and housing. As the months dragged on, she noticed the toll on her 8-year-old son. He was hospitalized for heat exhaustion after spending the day outside, and she worried about the school he missed.
Davis helped Ortiz as she hit dead ends in her search for a place to stay, according to text messages reviewed by ProPublica.
She said she had called 211 over and over, answering the same questions about her living situation, only to receive information she could have found through a simple internet search. She said a worker with the Family Housing Hub told her that since she and her children were sleeping in her car, she wasn’t actually homeless. Another told her the waitlist was full.
In June, she spent the day at a Phoenix cooling center to escape the heat. A representative told her to go to UMOM, which runs an emergency shelter for families. She said she used her last $20 on a rideshare to the shelter. They took her information again and told her she wasn’t “in the system.” Nothing was available. UMOM said to protect the privacy of clients, it does not comment on individual families.
At the end of August, she connected with the Phoenix Rescue Mission, a nonprofit that offers programs for homeless people. The group sent Ortiz to a local apartment complex where she viewed an apartment. Later, a worker with the Phoenix Rescue Mission told her that it ran out of funding to pay for it, text messages reviewed by ProPublica show. Phoenix Rescue Mission did not respond to requests for comment.
UMOM, which during the last fiscal year received more than $7 million in government grants, set aside 23 units of shelter and about a dozen tents for families this summer, as temperatures reached 117 degrees. The program, which is part of the city of Phoenix’s heat relief effort, has helped nearly 300 households so far but is winding down this month.
In early April, Davis had tried to force a broader effort to address the crisis by launching an online petition. It called on Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, to declare a state of emergency to address family homelessness. The petition has more than 5,000 signatures.
In June, a volunteer with Davis’ organization attended a fundraiser for Hobbs, who is running for reelection, to hand her a letter about the petition. The letter suggested such a declaration could unlock funding for emergency shelter and recommended making it easier to access the Family Housing Hub.
“I implore you to consider the children who endure extreme heat without safe shelter,” the letter stated. “No parent should be told to wait months for assistance while temperatures reach life-threatening levels.”

Davis told me he hasn’t heard from the governor’s office or from other nonprofit leaders about joining his effort — only from caseworkers hoping he might help them find shelter for families. He wished that other organizations would at least acknowledge the problem and called their silence “frustrating” and a “disservice” to those in crisis.
The governor’s press secretary, Liliana Soto, told me emergency declarations are reserved for natural disasters, and using one to address homelessness might not be appropriate. Soto added that the governor is “deeply aware” of these challenges. Since taking office in 2023, Hobbs has allocated at least $245 million statewide on efforts such as eviction prevention, affordable housing, emergency shelter and rapidly rehousing people experiencing housing insecurity. “The governor believes no family, especially families with infants or young children, should be left without a safe place to go during the summer heat,” Soto said in a statement.
Davis sees families in that situation daily. And he spends most nights pleading for money on social media to put them in hotel rooms. Some nights he has raised thousands of dollars, posting updates at 2 a.m.
In September, Davis’ organization started hosting an overnight shelter at the First United Methodist Church of Mesa. It has space for at least six families. Davis said he knows it’s a Band-Aid on a much bigger problem.
At the church on a recent evening, some families arrived in vehicles packed with their belongings. Inside a large air-conditioned room, a volunteer had set up canopy tents with cots, pillows and blankets. She offered them a dinner of chicken penne pasta.
A mother and her two children showered, then got in their tent and zipped it up. Gradually, others, some with toddlers, settled in, and the room became quiet.
They’d need to be gone by 6 a.m.

The post Homeless Shelters Around Phoenix Are Full. His Phone Is the Unofficial Hotline for Struggling Families. appeared first on ProPublica.
Il rapporto tra Anthropic Claude e la cyberdifesa entra in una fase del tutto nuova. Anthropic ha infatti annunciato un'importante espansione del suo Cyber Verification Program, un'iniziativa che apre le porte dei suoi modelli di intelligenza artificiale più avanzati ai professionisti del settore.
Ma cosa significa per il futuro della lotta contro le minacce digitali? È un passo coraggioso per potenziare chi ci difende, gestendo al contempo il rischio che questi stessi strumenti possano essere usati in modo malevolo.
Il dilemma è noto: gli strumenti di IA che aiutano un difensore a trovare una falla di sicurezza sono spesso gli stessi che potrebbero aiutare un aggressore a sfruttarla. La soluzione di Anthropic è un programma di accesso verificato, che offre ai professionisti modelli come Claude 3 Opus e Claude 3.5 Sonnet con meno restrizioni, in base al loro ruolo e alle loro autorizzazioni. Scopriamo insieme come funziona.
Pensa a questo programma come a una chiave speciale. Mentre i modelli Claude accessibili al pubblico mantengono rigide barriere per prevenire abusi, il Cyber Verification Program (CVP) fornisce una "chiave" a team e ricercatori verificati. Questa chiave sblocca capacità avanzate, consentendo loro di usare l'IA per compiti di sicurezza offensiva e difensiva in modo controllato.
L'obiettivo è semplice ma ambizioso: dare ai "buoni" gli strumenti migliori per anticipare, individuare e neutralizzare le minacce. Il programma unifica iniziative precedenti, come il Progetto Glasswing, creando un percorso di accesso strutturato e basato su permessi specifici.
In altre parole, non tutti avranno lo stesso livello di accesso, che dipende dal tipo di lavoro svolto tramite un sistema a tre livelli progettato per bilanciare potenzialità e sicurezza.
Test simili sono giù stati messi in atto, come utilizzare Claude Opus 5 per trovare falle in OpenAI, e correggerle.
Anthropic ha definito tre "tier" di accesso, ognuno con permessi e controlli specifici. Questa suddivisione è fondamentale per garantire che la potenza dell'IA sia usata in modo responsabile.
È il livello base, pensato per chi lavora in prima linea nella difesa digitale. Include team di sicurezza aziendali, centri operativi di sicurezza (SOC), analisti di malware, università ed enti governativi.
Le attività permesse sono strettamente difensive: analisi di vulnerabilità, incident response e reverse engineering.
Anche i ricercatori indipendenti con una comprovata storia di segnalazioni possono qualificarsi, rendendo lo strumento ampiamente accessibile a chi protegge le infrastrutture.
Questo livello è destinato a chi simula gli attacchi per testare le difese, i cosiddetti red team. Include team interni, agenzie governative e società di penetration testing.
Oltre alle capacità difensive, permette di condurre test di penetrazione autorizzati. Tuttavia, restano attivi dei controlli per bloccare azioni estremamente pericolose, come l'implementazione di ransomware o attacchi a sistemi fisici critici.
Siamo al vertice della piramide. Questo livello, con le minori restrizioni possibili, è riservato a un gruppo ristretto di organizzazioni autorizzate a testare le infrastrutture più critiche. Parliamo di reti elettriche, sistemi di controllo del traffico aereo e reti di telecomunicazioni.
L'approvazione per questo livello è molto rigorosa e viene gestita in collaborazione con il governo statunitense.
Ma funziona davvero? Anthropic ha messo alla prova il suo modello Claude 3.5 Sonnet con CyScenarioBench, un benchmark che misura la capacità di eseguire operazioni cyber complesse.
I risultati sono stati eloquenti:
Questi dati, sebbene interni, dimostrano l'efficacia del sistema a livelli. Inoltre, i partner del programma hanno già identificato oltre 129.000 vulnerabilità verificate tra aprile e luglio 2026, un dato che testimonia il potenziale di questa tecnologia per la sicurezza proattiva.
L'iniziativa di Anthropic segna un passo deciso verso l'integrazione dell'IA avanzata nelle operazioni di cyberdifesa. Fornendo un accesso controllato e stratificato, l'azienda cerca di risolvere il dilemma del doppio uso, potenziando i difensori senza armare gli avversari. Le organizzazioni possono richiedere l'accesso tramite la piattaforma Claude, Google Cloud Vertex AI e Microsoft Foundry.
La strada è ancora lunga, ma questo approccio pragmatico e basato sulla fiducia potrebbe diventare un modello per l'intero settore.
Stiamo forse assistendo alla nascita di una nuova generazione di difese, dove l'IA non è solo uno strumento, ma un vero e proprio alleato strategico? Solo il tempo potrà dirlo.
L'articolo Anthropic Claude e cyberdifesa: svolta nella sicurezza informatica proviene da sicurezza.net.
Bonjour,
Je lis avec surprise l’argument suivant pour justifier la disparition de l’option « Tout le monde peut modifier TOUTES les réponses » : « ce qui n’était pas sans poser son lot de problème ».
Dans les collectifs auxquels je participe, nous utilisions systématiquement cette option sans avoir jamais rencontré de problème avec cette fonctionnalité. Effectivement, lorsque l’option était sélectionnée, tout le monde pouvait modifier toutes les réponses. La fonctionnalité semblait donc parfaitement implémentée… En quoi cela peut-il être un problème ? Je n’ai jamais rencontré ce problème, mais il se peut que d’autres personnes n’aient pas eu la même expérience. Vous avez vraiment eu des retours dans ce sens ?
Ça s’appelle toujours « Framadate » mais ce n’est pas une nouvelle version (imiter le langage marketing n’aide en rien à clarifier les choses). Il s’agit d’une nouvelle application, avec un nouveau périmètre fonctionnel, une nouvelle ergonomie et de nouvelles interfaces utilisateurices. Il n’y a donc rien de surprenant à ce que la nouvelle application ne réponde pas aux besoins de toutes les utilisateurices de l’ancienne application. Le reste n’est que noyade de poisson.
Ceci dit, on a toutes les raisons de croire les équipes de Framasoft quand elles disent que l’ancienne appli était devenue trop complexe/hasardeuse/coûteuse/… à maintenir. Si la nouvelle application répond à certains besoins d’utlisateurices de l’ancienne, c’est tant mieux. Merci à Framasoft pour l’effort de ne pas laisser toustes les utilisateurices sur le carreau et merci au développeur d’avoir donné corps à une certaine vision des fonctionnalités minimales requises par un service permettant de créer des sondages en ligne.
Je reste perplexe devant la justification « technique » du choix d’écarter la possibilité pour toustes de modifier les votes pour ne proposer que la possibilité de modifier, sous certaines conditions, son propre vote. En premier lieu parce que la fonctionnalité écartée me semble, même vu de loin, plus simple à implémenter que la fonctionnalité retenue. Mais surtout parce que ce choix porte une certaine conception des modes de collaboration qu’il entend outiller. En effet, la fonctionnalité écartée permet, à coup sûr (sans aucune condition supplémentaire) à chaque personne de modifier son propre vote. Plus simple, englobante et plus plastique au regard des usages qu’elle permet, il est permis de se demander pourquoi une conception qui lui aurait donné la primauté serait aussi peu désirable…