We've all seen it: an unexpected management meeting that turns up in your calendar. It could mean HR wants a quiet and perhaps terminal word, or, in the case of NASA, something altogether different. During a chat with Space.com, NASA astronaut Bob Hines explained that the meeting was engineered to ensure all five Artemis III astronauts would be in the same room together and introduced face-to-face. The process space NASA uses to select astronauts has long been shrouded in mystery. The first American man in space, Alan Shepard, recalled in Light This Candle that his assignment to the Mercury 7 – the first batch of NASA astronauts – came from a caller who said, "We'd like you to join us. Are you still willing to volunteer?" Shepard later learned he would be the first American man in space during a meeting with fellow astronauts Gus Grissom and John Glenn, plus the Director of the Space Task Group, Bob Gilruth. Gilruth said, "Alan Shepard will make the first suborbital flight." Several factors went into that decision, including the seven Mercury astronauts rating their peers. In his memoir, Riding Rockets, Space Shuttle astronaut Mike Mullane recalled receiving a summons, along with four crewmates, to the office of then Director of Flight Operations, George Abbey. In that meeting, Abbey apparently asked: "We've been looking at the mission manifest, and think it's time to assign some more crews. I was wondering if you would be interested in STS-41D?" The whys and wherefores were unimportant. The astronauts were just delighted to get an assignment. These days, an unannounced management meeting with invitees a person might not normally see on a request is apparently how things are done. How those invitees are picked, however, remains a little opaque. With luck, NASA has sorted out the Outlook problem that bedeviled Artemis II, in which an astronaut plaintively told controllers, "I have two Outlooks, and neither one of those is working." Artemis III is, after all, set to be a very complicated mission, and, if all goes to plan, the crew will have fewer than 18 months to train. That is considerably less than the three years the Artemis II crew spent preparing for their mission to the Moon. The crew of four – three NASA astronauts and one European Space Agency astronaut (with Bob Hines as back-up) – will ideally rendezvous with two commercial spacecraft to check out docking operations and, in the case of Blue Origin, enter the vehicle. All this will take place in Low Earth Orbit as a precursor to the Artemis IV mission, which NASA expects will land humans on the Moon for the first time since the final Apollo mission in 1972. The meeting reportedly happened two weeks before the public announcement of the crew, and NASA's chief astronaut, Scott Tingle, told the group, "Look around. This is your Artemis 3 crew." Hines told Space.com, "That was a really, really cool way to find out." Certainly better than being presented with a pink slip by HR and a box to pack your possessions. ®

NASA's sprint to save the Swift observatory has reached another milestone: Katalyst Space's LINK robotic servicing spacecraft is now installed atop its Pegasus XL launcher. The milestone came less than a year after the space agency awarded the rescue contract. The next step will be to attach the Pegasus XL to the Stargazer carrier aircraft (the last airworthy Lockheed L-1011 TriStar), which will carry it from NASA's Wallops facility to the Kwajalein Atoll in the South Pacific Ocean for launch. Launch is expected to occur later this month. The goal is to boost the Swift observatory, whose orbit is decaying faster than expected due to increased solar activity. Swift lacks thrusters to compensate for the problem, so a return to Earth in the coming months is inevitable without intervention. Engineers recently bought the vehicle a little extra time by orienting the spacecraft and reducing the science output, but there is precious little margin in the timelines. The mission is high-risk, and Swift has little to lose. However, if successful, the approach could extend the lifetimes of other craft, including the Hubble Space Telescope, which will also re-enter the atmosphere in the coming years without intervention. Although NASA rejected a proposal by its now administrator Jared Isaacman to reboost the observatory using a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft, if the mission to Swift is a success, the agency will have another, far less expensive, option to consider. Like Swift, Hubble's orbit is decaying, and there will come a point in the coming years when managers must decide whether to attempt to extend the life of the veteran observatory, devise a way of performing a controlled re-entry, or let nature take its course. Swift was one of the missions slated for the chopping block under proposed budget cuts, so a successful rescue would mark a remarkable turnaround. Extending spacecraft beyond their primary mission isn't unusual. ESA, for instance, just endorsed extensions for several veteran missions, including Mars Express, XMM-Newton, and SOHO. But a Swift-style orbital rescue is something altogether different, and one that operators of other spacecraft facing decaying orbits will be watching closely. ®