© Photo illustration by The New York Times; source images by LightFieldStudios, and Valentina Khruslova, via Getty Images
© Eric Lee for The New York Times
© Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times
© Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times
© Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times
© Pool photo by Thibault Camus
© Kenny Holston/The New York Times
© CBC
© Eric Lee for The New York Times
© Brad J. Vest for The New York Times
© Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Office 2024 Pro e Windows 11 Pro a prezzo scontato: licenze genuine, acquisto una tantum e consegna istantanea. Approfitta dell’offerta Godeal24.
The post Office 2024 Pro + Windows 11 Pro a 27,25€: bundle in offerta per chi deve aggiornare il PC appeared first on Punto Informatico.
© Arash Khamooshi/Polaris for The New York Times
© The New York Times
© Kenny Holston/The New York Times
© Kenny Holston/The New York Times
© Tim Gruber for The New York Times
I ghiacciai non sono soltanto riserve d’acqua, ma ospitano anche una biodiversità animale ancora in larga parte sconosciuta che la rapida fusione dei ghiacciai rischia di cancellare prima ancora che sia stata pienamente studiata. È quanto emerge – riporta LaPresse – da uno studio internazionale guidato da ricercatori dell’Università statale di Milano, in collaborazione con il Museo delle scienze di Trento, che fornisce la prima sintesi globale delle conoscenze sugli animali degli ambienti glaciali e mette in evidenza quanto questa fauna sia oggi esposta agli effetti del ritiro dei ghiacciai. Pubblicata sulla rivista scientifica Pnas e basata su un ampio database globale, l’analisi mostra che, nonostante ghiacciai e calotte polari coprano circa il 10 per cento della superficie terrestre, la biodiversità animale che ospitano è ancora poco conosciuta. Gli autori definiscono quindi gli ambienti glaciali veri e propri ‘darkspots’ della biodiversità, in cui si ritiene possano esserci ancora molte specie da scoprire. Attraverso una revisione sistematica della letteratura scientifica e dei dati disponibili, basata sull’analisi di 2.695 articoli, i ricercatori hanno documentato almeno 152 specie animali legate a ghiacciai e calotte polari, appartenenti a 14 classi diverse. Tra i gruppi più rappresentati figurano rotiferi, collemboli e tardigradi, piccoli organismi capaci di adattarsi a condizioni ambientali estreme.Il dato più significativo riguarda però 73 specie segnalate esclusivamente in habitat glaciali: i cosiddetti ‘glacier specialists’, che dipendono strettamente dalla presenza del ghiaccio e risultano quindi particolarmente vulnerabili alla sua scomparsa. Per valutarne l’esposizione al cambiamento climatico, i ricercatori hanno incrociato la loro distribuzione attuale con diversi scenari futuri di ritiro dei ghiacciai. I risultati indicano un declino drastico: anche in uno scenario di riscaldamento molto limitato, entro il 2100 tre specie perderebbero completamente il loro habitat: i collemboli Desoria calderonis e Vertagopus fradustaensis e il tardigrado Adropion afroglaciali, mentre altre 12 specie ne perderebbero oltre il 90 per cento.
(Foto di repertorio)
The post CLIMA, STUDIO: “CON RITIRO GHIACCIAI SCOMPARE FAUNA ANCORA SCONOSCIUTA” appeared first on nelcuore.org.
The company is enhancing third-party risk management (TPRM) through autonomous AI agents.
The post Magnitude Emerges From Stealth Mode With $10 Million in Funding appeared first on SecurityWeek.
© Arash Khamooshi/Polaris for The New York Times
© Jean-Christophe Verhaegen/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
© Jean-Christophe Verhaegen/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
© Pool photo by Thibault Camus
© Pool photo by Thibault Camus
Ent has developed an intent-aware platform designed to interpret user and agent behavior before risky actions are carried out.
The post Endpoint Security Startup Ent Emerges From Stealth With $100 Million Seed Round appeared first on SecurityWeek.
NSPM-12 establishes a clear structure for NSS cybersecurity governance and accountability and reestablishes CNSS.
The post White House Issues Memo to Bolster NSS Cybersecurity appeared first on SecurityWeek.
© Gabriel V. Cárdenas for The New York Times
© Damon Winter/The New York Times
It was before dawn on a Friday in January when a Gulfstream G600 with the burnt-orange Texas Longhorns logo on its tail landed at Dulles airport outside Washington, D.C. Its owner, a little-known oil billionaire named Jeffery Hildebrand, had been summoned to the White House.
By mid-afternoon he was in the East Room, just three seats from President Donald Trump, who had recently ordered the military raid that captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro. Now Trump wanted Hildebrand and two dozen other energy executives to commit to investing $100 billion in Venezuela’s decrepit oil industry.
Many couched their enthusiasm with caveats. ExxonMobil’s CEO called Venezuela “uninvestable” without changes to its legal system. The head of ConocoPhillips wanted U.S. government financing.
But Hildebrand, a major Trump donor whose wife had been named ambassador to Costa Rica, had already seen how loyalty could be rewarded. Even though he had no notable operations outside the U.S., he hunched toward a microphone and said in a halting voice, “Hilcorp is fully committed and ready to go to rebuilding the infrastructure in Venezuela.”
“That’s good,” Trump said. “You’ll be very happy.”
As the founder and owner of Hilcorp, a privately held company known for buying up old, low-producing “stripper wells,” Hildebrand needs Trump’s favor. Long one of the oil industry’s top polluters, Hilcorp releases unusually large quantities of methane, a greenhouse gas that can trap 80 times more heat than carbon dioxide.
Hildebrand had never been a leading political contributor. But in 2024, the Biden administration issued aggressive restrictions on methane pollution — rules that would impose steep costs on Hilcorp — and the once-obscure tycoon became one of Trump’s biggest oil industry supporters, giving millions to his campaign.
Trump has since named a former Hilcorp lobbyist to a top post at the Environmental Protection Agency, putting him in charge of an effort to unravel the methane rules with help from trade groups backed by Hildebrand, a ProPublica investigation has found. That will bring a sweeping reprieve for the nation’s 700,000 stripper wells, boosting Hildebrand’s profits while saddling society as a whole with the climate fallout.
We’re still reporting. If you know more about the Trump administration’s climate policies, please contact our reporting team.
Alex Cuadros
I welcome tips or documents about Trump administration climate policy or actions by private companies or institutions that may impact the climate.
Stripper wells collectively contribute just 6% of the nation’s oil and natural gas. But in recent studies, scientists have identified them as the source of roughly half the sector’s methane emissions — in part because they tend to be thinly monitored, run-down and thus prone to leaking. As a result, these barely productive wells play an outsize role in climate change, disproportionately amplifying heat waves, droughts and wildfires.
In a world where global warming fixes can seem impossibly daunting, stripper wells are the rare low-hanging fruit, said Andrew Logan of Ceres, a climate advocacy group.
“If you could lose 6% of production and cut emissions in half, who wouldn’t make that trade?” Logan said. “It’s a question of who benefits and who doesn’t, and who has the power.”
Kendra Pinto and Josh Eisenfeld drove a rented Dodge Ram to the site of a Hilcorp well in San Juan County, New Mexico, last August. As infrared camera operators with the nonprofit Earthworks, they were used to roaming through remote areas to investigate leaks at oil and gas wells. But the San Juan is especially lonely terrain, with bumpy dirt roads snaking between scattered scrub and rusting pump jacks, the nodding apparatuses that lift oil and gas from thousands of feet underground.
A sign marked the site as Hilcorp’s Huerfano Unit 119 well, one of the company’s 11,000 in the region. It was little more than a patch of gravel hosting two unmarked storage tanks and what oil workers call a Christmas tree: the cluster of valves that caps the well itself. Drilled in 1969, the well now produces a small but steady trickle of natural gas, enough to generate around $50 of revenue per day.
On paper, it runs remarkably cleanly. According to New Mexico’s oil regulator, Hilcorp has not reported any “venting” — releasing gas — from the well since May 2024. At the site itself, however, a wire fence surrounded some of the equipment, bearing a yellow caution sign that read, “Well vents randomly.”
Methane is invisible to the human eye. But on June 29 last year, a satellite detected a massive methane plume erupting from this very location. According to the nonprofit Carbon Mapper, a NASA partner that one oil executive defined as a “platform to disseminate the sins of our industry,” the methane was being discharged at a rate of 199 kilograms an hour. That’s equivalent to about 12 times the volume of natural gas the well typically produces over that time. The cause was unknown, but according to scientists who have studied the issue, such “super-emitter” events typically stem from some kind of neglect or malfunction — if not from an intentional release. Most last a couple of hours, but some can go on for weeks. Super-emitter plumes have also been identified at other Hilcorp wells.
Pinto and Eisenfeld observed smaller, more persistent leaks as well. When they trained their infrared camera on one of the storage tanks, wispy clouds of pollution could be seen streaming from a pressure-release valve.
“That shouldn’t just be constantly …” Eisenfeld said, trailing off. The finding was far from abnormal, though. Of the eight Hilcorp wells he and Pinto visited that day, seven were seen to be leaking.
In response to a detailed list of questions from ProPublica, Hilcorp spokesperson Nick Piatek said in an email that the Huerfano Unit 119 well “is fully compliant with state and federal regulations” and that the company inspects the site monthly. He also suggested that the company’s approach caused less environmental harm than drilling new wells: “By extending and optimizing the life of existing assets with pre-built infrastructure, our model limits the need for new development elsewhere.” The company is “proud,” he added, of recent efforts to reduce its emissions.
Hilcorp is hardly an outlier in its approach to methane releases. America’s oil and gas system is vast, aging, and in many places largely left to police itself. Of the country’s roughly 1 million active wells, more than two-thirds are stripper wells, each producing the equivalent of up to 15 barrels a day. Many produce less than a single barrel a day. (Newer wells, by contrast, can pump 1,000 a day or more.) Each well site, in turn, is equipped with numerous valves, flanges and other fittings that can leak unless inspected regularly. Some components were explicitly designed to vent small amounts of gas — a legacy of an era when methane’s role in global warming wasn’t widely understood.
Methane, the main component of natural gas, turns into carbon dioxide when burned to heat a home or generate electricity. But when the gas enters the atmosphere directly, it becomes a much more powerful climate pollutant — one that is responsible for one-third of the rise in global temperatures since the Industrial Revolution.
Methane exists underground alongside other fossil fuels and is brought to the surface whether oil or natural gas is being pumped. While it’s a valuable product in itself, capturing it is not always cost-effective. So companies often burn it off, or just vent it, sending it straight into the atmosphere. Apart from the climate impact, this is all sheer waste, as none of the methane’s energy is being harnessed for a human need. Yet with few exceptions, federal rules have allowed these practices at wells drilled before 2012 — which include the overwhelming majority of stripper wells.
Methane leakage is such a routine part of oil and gas production that the EPA often assumes it is happening when asking the industry to calculate its emissions. Even so, those numbers drastically understate the actual emissions observed by plane and satellite. A study led by Evan Sherwin of Stanford, published in the journal Nature in 2024, took close to a million measurements to find that the true figures were, on average, nearly three times higher. Partly that is because companies have never had to report super-emitter events to the EPA. In one region, nearly 10% of all the natural gas produced was being lost to the atmosphere, the study found.
But limiting methane pollution presents a rare opportunity. While carbon dioxide can persist in the atmosphere for centuries, methane breaks down relatively fast, in about a dozen years. Halting these releases, then, would bring a swift payoff.
“Methane is the best lever we have to slow the march of climate change in our lifetime,” said Stanford researcher Rob Jackson. That is especially important, he added, as the planet approaches tipping points — temperature thresholds beyond which forests, coral reefs and ice sheets start to collapse irreversibly.
Unlike with other major methane sources, such as belching cattle or melting permafrost, the technology to curb emissions from oil and gas operations is already viable, and fairly cheap. In the fight against global warming, Jackson said, “It’s the best bang for our buck.”
To build a fortune on the discarded scraps of the oil and gas industry takes a rare instinct for hidden value, an appetite for risk and an obsession with keeping costs down.
Among the nation’s stripper well owners, Hildebrand has done it best, amassing a fortune estimated by Bloomberg at $15 billion. Yet at a time when many billionaires are embracing celebrity, he has maintained an unusually low profile. At 67, he’s almost completely avoided speaking to reporters, and he didn’t respond to multiple interview requests from ProPublica. Even Trump, despite having invited him to the White House, seemed hazy on Hildebrand’s role in the oil industry. “I hear he does a good job,” the president said when reached by ProPublica on his cellphone.
While he avoids the public eye, Hildebrand circulates openly in the overlapping worlds of wealthy businesspeople, private clubs and Republican power brokers. He has been known to hold exclusive parties at his 1,200-acre ranch in Aspen, Colorado — which used to belong, in part, to the musician (and environmentalist) John Denver. He also owns a polo team called Tonkawa, a fixture of the winter season in the sport’s unofficial capital of Wellington, Florida, a short drive from Mar-a-Lago. A video of a 2021 match shows him in a white helmet and forest-green jersey, riding a bay pony as he swings his mallet, trying and failing to keep the ball from the opposing side’s patron, a Russian banker named Andrey Borodin.
There’s a striking tension between Hildebrand’s status as one of the country’s most prolific polluters and his otherwise conventional life as a God-fearing, upstanding Texas businessman. He is less a rogue actor than the product of a deeply American system that rewards production at all costs.
A devout Catholic and philanthropist, he is especially passionate about wildlife conservation, according to Stuart Stedman and Karen Starr Hunke, fellow board members at Texas A&M’s Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute. Yet they and others who know him through the institute said they’d never once heard him mention climate change — an omission that points to a far narrower view of environmental stewardship.
The closest Hildebrand has come to addressing the issue publicly is in a rare speech he gave in 2022, accepting an award as a distinguished alumnus at UT Austin. A husky, square-jawed man, he wore a burnt-orange suit jacket and a burnt-orange tie. He cited an old quote he interpreted as a celebration of the oil industry: “Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth.” Then he quipped that “in this Green New Deal era we live in” — a reference to the Democrats’ climate agenda — such sentiments might no longer be welcome.
Born in 1959 in Houston, America’s energy capital, Hildebrand graduated from high school at a time when oil prices were soaring. Determined to start his own oil business, he studied geology and petroleum engineering at UT Austin, where he was in the Kappa Alpha fraternity. He worked briefly for Exxon and a few other companies, including that of a prominent Houston investor named Jack Trotter, before starting Hilcorp in ’89 with Trotter’s backing.
The oil business is filled with stories of crazy risks, near-bankruptcies and improbable rebounds. Hildebrand likes to recount that he used his wife’s car as collateral for a loan to drill some early wells. In a speech for his induction into the Texas Business Hall of Fame, he said they turned out to be “dry holes” — failures — but the return on Melinda’s investment would prove “infinite” (only a slight exaggeration).
He started buying stripper wells from larger companies, a niche that is relatively cheap to break into. As a well ages and the underlying reservoir is depleted, pressure in the well drops, and production along with it. The price for a package of these wells tends to be low — one friend recalled “when a big deal for Jeff was $5 million” — but to turn a profit, the new owners have to cut costs. Typically they do this by playing fast and loose with environmental rules, according to Clark Williams-Derry of the nonprofit Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, who calls this the “dung beetle model.”
As Hildebrand expanded into other states, loading up on debt to make ever larger acquisitions, there’s evidence he followed this model. According to records obtained by ProPublica from state and federal environmental regulators, his company has racked up dozens of violations over the past decade. To cite one notable example, after a Hilcorp natural gas pipeline ruptured in Alaska’s Cook Inlet in December 2016, it spewed methane for nearly four months until it was finally repaired. Activists across the country call the company “Spillcorp.”
The penalties, though, have largely amounted to a slap on the wrist, rarely exceeding $500,000 — and often coming in far lower. “I would frankly put that in the category of just operating costs,” said Matt Bernstein, an analyst at the research firm Rystad Energy.
What set Hildebrand apart from other “dung beetles” was that he also found ways to squeeze out more oil and gas from aging wells, not only cutting costs but increasing revenue. His secret was what he has called a “pretty simple” formula: attract top geologists and engineers by offering Wall Street-style incentives, allowing them to effectively take partnership stakes in projects. According to a person involved in an early deal, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, Hildebrand would offer 1.1 times what Hilcorp’s own analysis said an acquisition was worth, betting on the “magic” of his team.
The 2010s saw the landmark Paris Agreement on global warming, the rise of teen activist Greta Thunberg and the first pledge by a major oil company to effectively zero its emissions. None of that dissuaded Hildebrand from doubling down on aging wells. In 2017, he spent $3 billion to mount his largest acquisition yet: ConocoPhillips’ operation in the San Juan Basin, where Pinto and Eisenfeld would later identify so many leaks. Once among the country’s top sources of natural gas, the region had since fallen into decline — and it was already notorious for its methane pollution.
Soon after, according to a Clean Air Task Force analysis of data companies report to the EPA, Hilcorp became the No. 1 emitter of methane in the entire U.S. oil and gas industry.
President Joe Biden presented the first serious threat to Hildebrand’s business. As part of his ambitious climate agenda, the EPA issued rules aimed at cutting methane pollution from oil and gas operations by a whopping 80% — and they took direct aim at stripper wells.
For the first time, outside a patchwork of state rules, older wells would face requirements for regular leak inspections and limits on venting and flaring. Companies would be forced to respond to satellite reports of super-emitters, making repairs if necessary. A fee would also be imposed on excess methane emissions, costing the oil and gas industry an estimated $500 million a year.
Even the Department of Justice got involved, filing suits to crack down on improper methane releases. One found that Hilcorp had failed to capture the emissions when it redrilled 145 wells in the San Juan — discharges large enough that Don Schreiber, a rancher who documented some of the events, described hearing a “jet engine” sound as the gas rushed into the air. This time, the penalties were more than a slap on the wrist; although Hilcorp did not admit to wrongdoing, it settled the allegations for $9.4 million.
With the new rules gradually being phased in, Hildebrand effectively made parallel bets. Getting a jump on compliance, Hilcorp started upgrading much of its aging equipment — and its methane numbers declined.
“That’s a win,” said Lesley Feldman of the Clean Air Task Force, a nonprofit that advocates for cutting emissions. “That means the policy is working. And we’ve seen evidence of other companies doing this too.”
Yet while Feldman celebrated the reductions, she did question their magnitude. Hilcorp spokesperson Piatek said the company’s methane numbers had fallen by “nearly 80% in recent years.” But, Feldman said after examining Hilcorp’s most recent data, that decline is artificially inflated by recent changes to the reporting rules, which make comparisons to previous years misleading. The data itself may be suspect, she added, because the EPA has yet to publicly verify it — and Hilcorp has previously made huge upward revisions to its reported emissions. (Piatek didn’t respond when ProPublica pointed out the artificially inflated reduction.)
Even taking the numbers at face value, Hilcorp remains one of the oil industry’s top methane emitters, according to a ProPublica analysis of EPA data.
Since he was still looking at substantial compliance costs, Hildebrand’s other bet was to step up his political contributions. Since 2020, he and his wife have given more than $15 million to Trump and other Republicans in federal races, placing them among the top donors in an industry that overwhelmingly supports the president and his party. (That compares to just over $3 million in the entire two decades prior.) The recipients have included Sen. Ted Cruz and Rep. August Pfluger, both of Texas — two of the most vocal opponents to the methane fee, which they call the “natural gas tax.”
During the 2024 campaign, Hildebrand also co-hosted at least three high-dollar fundraisers for Trump, who promised to “unleash American energy” by dismantling climate regulations. One was a lavish dinner held a short drive from Hildebrand’s Aspen ranch, at a home sprinkled with art by Andy Warhol (a tiny self-portrait), Damien Hirst (a mirrored pill cabinet) and Jack Pierson (mismatched lettering that spelled out the word “badass”). The home belonged to another donor later graced with an appointment: the investor John Phelan, who would briefly serve as Trump’s Navy secretary.
Hildebrand co-hosted two of the fundraisers in Houston. One was reportedly scheduled to take place at his own home, but, due to security concerns, it was moved to a hotel owned by the sports and entertainment magnate Tilman Fertitta, who would be named ambassador to Italy. The other was followed by a private roundtable where, according to Teofilo Lingi, an investor who was present, oil executives discussed the methane rules with Trump himself.
At a previous event with Trump, Hildebrand said, “I’m really here today to represent the independent energy companies, the family-owned businesses that are in this industry.”
This mom-and-pop image clashes with the reality that the independents, as they are known, are highly organized into an alphabet soup of newly influential lobbying groups — with Hildebrand a member of several. Hilcorp CEO Greg Lalicker sits on the board of the American Exploration and Production Council (AXPC), which also represents Diversified, the country’s single largest owner of stripper wells. At least until recently, another Hilcorp executive was a director at the Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA), which represents smaller producers, including many stripper well owners.
In an industry long hostile to regulation, the independents have often displayed a more open contempt toward climate policy than the global oil giants. And they have historically had little say in emissions rules. “They didn’t want to be regulated, but they kind of knew that was a losing argument,” said Joseph Goffman, who held top EPA roles under both President Barack Obama and Biden.
Hildebrand received an early sign that was going to change when, less than three weeks after the 2025 inauguration, Trump tapped his wife to be ambassador to Costa Rica — even though she was primarily known for charity work and for opening a doughnut shop in their wealthy Houston neighborhood of River Oaks. Melinda Hildebrand didn’t respond to requests for comment, but when ProPublica asked Trump why he appointed her, he said, “I don’t know, because you know, I get recommendations. … I see the list of people, but we only name good people, and I’m sure she’s very good.”
Later that month, the Republican-controlled Congress effectively killed the methane fee, and Trump nominated a former Hilcorp lobbyist named Aaron Szabo to oversee the EPA’s climate regulations.
Szabo, an otherwise inconspicuous former bureaucrat, helped to unite two distinct networks with overlapping ambitions. As a lobbyist for Hilcorp and other oil and gas companies, he had already helped to draft a letter from the AXPC opposing the new methane rules. He then became a fellow at the Trump-aligned America First Policy Institute and gave advice on climate regulations for the EPA chapter of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, the deregulatory blueprint for the second Trump administration. The chapter specifically recommended dismantling the program to address super-emitters.
Now tasked with rewriting the methane rules, Szabo has been seeking input from oil industry groups including the AXPC, the IPAA and the National Stripper Well Association (NSWA), according to interviews with industry representatives and current and former EPA officials, records of closed-door conversations, and agency emails and calendar entries obtained through public records requests by the watchdog group Fieldnotes and shared with ProPublica.
“It’s the first time in 20 years of my business that they’ll even answer the phone,” NSWA Chair Patrick Montalban told ProPublica, referring to top regulators. He described an informal atmosphere where independent oil executives called on old personal connections to open the doors. He himself had met not just with Szabo but with EPA chief Lee Zeldin, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and Energy Secretary Chris Wright. He and Wright, he noted, have both served on the board of yet another oil industry group. (Press offices for the departments of Interior and Energy didn’t respond to emails seeking comment.)
The IPAA’s Lee Fuller, on a private conference call with industry representatives, also spoke glowingly about a meeting with Szabo’s office last year. Previously, he said, the EPA had never even considered the group’s requests to create separate methane rules for stripper wells. This time, though, agency staff brought it up unprompted — which suggests that it was already on Szabo’s agenda. Presented with this opening, the IPAA later asked for stripper wells to be exempted from the methane rules entirely.
Hilcorp spokesperson Piatek declined to answer questions from ProPublica about the influence campaign. The IPAA also declined to comment but sent an email linking to a recent statement of support for deregulating stripper wells that nonetheless nodded toward “our shared environmental goals.”
The heart of the stripper-well owners’ argument is that they simply cannot afford to be regulated. “Venting and flaring are essential for the survivability of low production wells,” an IPAA lawyer named James D. Elliott wrote in an email to EPA officials last year. He cited estimates that the methane rules would force 300,000 of the lowest-producing wells to shut down. Framing this as a blow to small-business owners, he didn’t acknowledge that it would have almost no impact on the U.S. energy supply.
The AXPC declined to answer ProPublica’s questions about the group’s interactions with Szabo’s staff but sent a statement from CEO Anne Bradbury saying its members were “committed to building on a legacy of world-leading methane emission reductions.” In a “policy roadmap” published on its website in March, however, it asked the EPA to “incorporate greater flexibility for low-producing and mature assets.”
Some members of the coalition have argued, inaccurately, that stripper wells are not significant sources of methane pollution. In a Zoom interview with ProPublica, NSWA board member Sam Bradley played a slideshow that he said he’d shared with Szabo’s staff. One slide purported to show the emissions from various sources. Stripper wells ranked lower than both the collective exhalations of the U.S. populace and what Bradley called “smoke and brisket” — barbecues. (In reality, these are negligible sources of emissions.)
Hildebrand and his fellow stripper-well owners appear likely to win exemptions. Speaking with industry representatives last month, the AXPC’s Wendy Kirchoff shared early details of Szabo’s plan to weaken the methane rules, confirming it will cover stripper wells, according to a recording reviewed by ProPublica.
Szabo himself didn’t respond to questions sent by ProPublica, and the EPA’s press office declined to comment on the details. But the agency confirmed it is working on a proposal to “provide relief” to the oil industry, saying in a statement, “We heard consistently from American oil and natural gas producers (shocker that we meet with stakeholders) that the Biden-Harris Administration’s oil and gas methane regulations were unworkable and unnecessarily restricted American energy dominance.”
To protect carve-outs from rollback by a future Democratic administration, Pfluger, the representative from Texas, and Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., have proposed a bill to simply exempt stripper wells from EPA emissions rules — allowing them to pollute the atmosphere at will, with scant economic benefit. The NSWA and the IPAA both helped to craft the legislation, according to an internal newsletter from a state trade group that represents many stripper-well owners.
In effect, the Trump administration and its allies in Congress are weighing whether to preserve the business model that made Hildebrand rich, no matter the cost to the global climate. As energy assets, his wells may be marginal. But as political currency, they have become more valuable than ever before.
The post Trump Plans to Protect Methane-Leaking Stripper Wells. This Billionaire Donor Will Benefit. appeared first on ProPublica.
© Adam Ferguson for The New York Times
I Mondiali di Calcio non sono un semplice torneo: rappresentano l’evento sportivo più atteso dagli appassionati, il momento in cui nazionali, tifosi e grandi campioni si ritrovano sul palcoscenico più prestigioso del mondo. La FIFA World Cup 2026 promette spettacolo, rivalità storiche e partite decisive, con la possibilità di ammirare le gesta di stelle come […]
The post Migliori VPN per Mondiali di Calcio 2026: Streaming Veloce e Sicuro appeared first on Punto Informatico.
© Adam Ferguson for The New York Times
© Mark Peterson/Redux, for The New York Times
© Michael A. McCoy for The New York Times
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
© Eric Lee for The New York Times
© Nick Oxford for The New York Times
© Illustration by The New York Times
© Alex Kent/The New York Times
© Godofredo A. Vásquez/Associated Press
© Doug Mills/The New York Times
© RaiNews
© Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times
© Eric Lee for The New York Times
© Pool photo by Carlos Jasso
© Pool photo by Carlos Jasso
© Arash Khamooshi/Polaris for The New York Times
© Pool photo by Ilia Yefimovich
© Eric Lee for The New York Times
© Eric Lee for The New York Times
© Pool photo by Ilia Yefimovich
© Katie Collins/Reuters
© Carlos Jasso/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
© Carlos Jasso/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
© Eric Lee for The New York Times
© Brendan Hoffman for The New York Times
© Brendan Hoffman for The New York Times
© Brendan Hoffman for The New York Times
© Andre Penner/Associated Press
© Eric Lee for The New York Times
© Michael Brochstein/Sipa USA, via Associated Press; Mike Stewart/Associated Press
© Nina Riggio for The New York Times
© Doug Mills/The New York Times
© Audra Melton for The New York Times
© Federico Rios for The New York Times
© Ryan Murphy for The New York Times
© Federico Rios for The New York Times
PORTOFERRAIO – Traghetti elettrici e sostenibilità sono questi i temi al centro dell’evento “Il Corridoio Blu, I traghetti full-electric per un clima e un turismo più sostenibili“, in programma oggi a Portoferraio, dove verrà presentata un’analisi tecnica ed economica sul potenziale di elettrificazione dei traghetti in Italia. Il confronto vede la presenza di istituzioni, mondo accademico e operatori del settore per delineare le prospettive della navigazione sostenibile nel Paese.
L’iniziativa si svolge presso la sala Nervi (Ex Gattaia), Via Vittorio Emanuele II, 6, Portoferraio.
E’ possibile seguire l’evento anche in diretta streaming: https://www.youtube.com/live/IzAiesdZNv0
PROGRAMMA
10.00 – 10.10 Apertura e saluti istituzionali
Tiziano Nocentini
Sindaco di Portoferraio
10.10 – 10.30 Presentazione T&E Analisi tecnica ed economica del potenziale di elettrificazione dei traghetti in Italia
Carlo Tritto, Sustainable Fuels Manager, T&E Italia
10.30 – 11.30 Panel 1 Quali opportunità per il sistema Paese: le prospettive delle istituzioni?
Intervengono:
Patrizia Scarchilli, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti – Direzione Generale per il Mare, il Trasporto Marittimo e per Vie d’Acqua Interne
Davide Gariglio, Presidente Autorità di Sistema Portuale del Mar Tirreno Settentrionale
David Barontini, Assessore all’Ambiente della Regione Toscana
Andrea Cocco, Autorità di Regolazione dei Trasporti
11.30 – 12.15 Panel 2 : Come passare dalle parole all’azione?
Guido Befani Università di Teramo Prospettive regolatorie, normative e applicative della portualità sostenibile*
Sara Salamone (RSE S.p.A.) e Marco Gallo (Università di Genova)
Elettrificazione dei traghetti: una rotta già tracciata. Sfide, tecnologie e soluzioni*
John Scanu, Econboard
AURORA: un progetto e una realizzazione pilota
12.30 – 12.45
Keynote Speech
Attilio Massa, Policy Officer, DG MOVE – Commissione Europea
12.45 – 13.15
Panel 3 Quali opportunità per l’impresa?
Intervengono:
Damiano Landi, TERNA S.p.A.
Edoardo D’Andrea, Confitarma
14.30 – 15.30
Panel 4 I benefici dell’elettrificazione dei traghetti sul territorio e per l’essere umano
Introduce e modera, Adolfo Santoro, Psichiatra e Psicoterapeuta
Intervengono:
Carla Ancona Epidemiologa, Servizio Sanitario del Lazio
L’ambiente nei porti italiani: i risultati del progetto SALPIAM*
Paolo Marzorati, Direttore Ospedale di Portoferraio
Transizione marittima verde e salute pubblica*
Matteo Arcenni, Presidente Parco Nazionale Arcipelago Toscano
15.30 – 16.00 Chiusura dei lavori
Rossana Bacci, Assessore all’Ambiente del Comune di Piombino
Andrea Boraschi, Direttore T&E Italia
L'articolo Portoferraio: Il Corridoio Blu – I traghetti full-electric per un clima e un turismo più sostenibili proviene da Corriere Marittimo.
© Katie Collins/Reuters
© Katie Collins/Reuters
© Ethan Noah Roy
© Kenny Holston/The New York Times
© Alex Kent/The New York Times
© Mike Kai Chen for The New York Times
© Eric Lee for The New York Times
© Kim Raff for The New York Times
© Nicole Craine for The New York Times
© Christopher Michel/Contour RA by Getty Images
© Michael Gottschalk/DDP, via Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
© Pool photo by Ronen Zvulun
© Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times
© Desiree Rios for The New York Times
© Michael Raines/Connected Archives
© Kenny Holston/The New York Times
© Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times
© Eric Lee/The New York Times
© Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times
© Audra Melton for The New York Times
© Kenny Holston/The New York Times
© Pool photo by David Mareuil
© Pool photo by David Mareuil
© John Taggart for The New York Times
© Jason Henry for The New York Times
© Rahmat Gul/Ap Photo/Rahmat Gul
© Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times
© Sebastien Bozon/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
© The New York Times
Bad Taste Collective presenta:
⚔️ SUMMER IN THE DUNGEON ⚔️
-ABARIS MOERAE - Dark Ambient - Helsinki;
-SPETTRO - Black Metal - Bologna;
-CAIRNN - Post-Metal - Firenze
19 Giugno 2026
21:00
CSA nEXt Emerson
Non vi preoccupate che a sto giro si farà in giardino.
Il nuovo assetto geopolitico mondiale ha messo a nudo una serie di problematiche che sono state trascurate troppo a lungo. In pratica, quello che per anni abbiamo visto accadere nel software, ovvero l’entusiasmo per le nuove feature che andava a coprire la necessità di rendere sicuro il loro utilizzo, si è applicato anche in mille […]
L'articolo Infrastrutture Critiche e Geopolitica: è l’Era dell’Antifragilità proviene da Securityinfo.it.
Trump administration officials earlier this year killed a federal criminal investigation into the coal empire owned by Sen. Jim Justice, a Republican from West Virginia and a close ally of the president’s.
The investigation examined potential criminal violations of the Clean Water Act by the multistate mining operations largely run by Justice’s son, Jay, according to current and former officials familiar with the matter.
The criminal probe was a significant escalation in the yearslong effort to police serial pollution offenses by Virginia-based Southern Coal and dozens of affiliated mining operations controlled by the family. In the past decade, Southern Coal and other Justice corporations have racked up tens of thousands of alleged violations of the Clean Water Act and have been sued repeatedly by state and federal prosecutors over their failure to properly follow environmental laws at their mining sites.
The investigation shuttered by the Trump administration was a joint effort by prosecutors and investigators with the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Justice’s Environmental Crimes Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Western District of Virginia to probe whether the incessant violations of antipollution laws had risen to the level of criminal behavior, people familiar with the matter said.
People familiar with the investigation told ProPublica that prosecutors believed they had a strong case. They initially had the blessing of Robert Tracci, President Donald Trump’s top official in the Western District of Virginia, to move forward.
But in recent months, as prosecutors battled the Justice companies in court over subpoenas for records, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General shut down the probe. At the time, Todd Blanche still headed the office, before assuming the role of acting attorney general in April.
“They were told ‘pencils down,’” a person familiar with the investigation said.
That prosecutors were even conducting a criminal investigation is noteworthy, people said, because the DOJ only charges a dozen or so criminal Clean Water Act cases each year. It is rare for top DOJ officials to derail a criminal investigation initiated by career officials at such an early stage, people familiar with the case said.
“I’ve never heard of that happening before,” said former federal prosecutor Rick Mountcastle, speaking generally about DOJ protocols. Mountcastle spent 24 years as a prosecutor in the Western District of Virginia. “There shouldn’t be some sort of untouchables list of people who are immune from enforcement.”
The move is part of a pattern of behavior at the top echelons of the DOJ to push cases against Trump’s political adversaries and ease up on allies.
Environmental enforcement against large polluters has plunged under the second Trump administration. Just days after inauguration, the administration reassigned top career environmental lawyers at the DOJ, including those overseeing the Southern Coal case, to work on the president’s immigration crackdown. At the beginning of the year, Blanche personally ordered prosecutors to stand down from cases against diesel emissions cheating.
We’re still reporting. If you know more about this case or other instances of the Trump administration shutting down criminal investigations, please contact our reporting team.
Molly Redden
Send me tips or documents about lawyers getting special access to the Trump administration, the DOJ rewarding Trump’s supporters and pursuing his enemies, the administration’s legal strategy, and the White House’s judicial appointments.
Steven Ruby, an attorney for the Justice companies, said they became aware of the criminal investigation earlier this year.
“Ultimately the finding of the inquiry by the government was that there wasn’t any evidence to pursue criminal charges,” Ruby said. “There’s never been any intentional wrongdoing by the companies.”
While objecting to the subpoenas in court, the company simultaneously convinced the DOJ to drop the case, he said.
“The Justice companies — because Sen. Justice has been governor and because he’s now a senator — are singled out and put under a microscope, and there’s news coverage of violations and consent decrees and compliance actions,” Ruby said. “But the fact of the matter is that those kinds of issues exist throughout the industry.”
Current and former government officials familiar with the companies’ environmental record called them routine bad actors.
Spokespeople for the EPA and the Western District of Virginia referred questions to the DOJ. Justice’s senate office did not respond to questions.
“There is no case to be made here for a criminal investigation,” Emily Covington, a DOJ spokeswoman, said in an email. “Any career prosecutor who would paint a criminal case as strong is simply a deep state prosecutor continuing to push the priorities of the Biden administration.”
The deputy attorney general’s office is routinely involved with reviewing cases, she added. The office determined that this case was not consistent with the Trump administration’s priorities, she continued, and it was more appropriate to resolve it through the less punitive civil process. “The bottom line is that this was a politically motivated prosecution for a case that can and should be resolved civilly,” she wrote.
The Justice family runs a sprawling coal mining enterprise that extends across the South. Estimates of its fortune fluctuate. Forbes tallied Jim Justice’s net worth to be as much as $1.9 billion until 2021; more recently, it declared him “broke” and facing $1 billion in debt. But environmental groups have accused his companies of misrepresenting their assets to avoid paying environmental penalties.
Ruby said company finances seesaw because coal is a “boom and bust” industry.
Justice, who was first elected governor of West Virginia as a Democrat, announced he had become a Republican at a Trump rally in 2017. Trump backed Justice’s bid for Senate in 2023, amid a contested GOP primary. Justice went on to win the seat, helping Trump clinch a GOP majority in the Senate.
Coal mines often leach dangerous chemicals like arsenic into waterways and are required to strictly monitor pollution discharge and keep it under certain limits. The family’s companies have settled many accusations of environmental violations by agreeing to pay fines and invest in better pollution prevention without admitting or denying culpability.
In recent years, however, the company has repeatedly flouted regulators and the legal process. Jay Justice has been a no-show at court hearings involving Clean Water Act violations in the past, and in 2024 a judge in Alabama issued a civil contempt order against him for his repeated failure to respond to those lawsuits. Ruby, the Justice companies’ lawyer, attributed the violations in that case to surrounding facilities the family does not own. The case is now in mediation.
A number of recent legal proceedings have laid bare the extent to which the Justice companies may have knowingly violated environmental laws, a key threshold for bringing a criminal matter.
Such allegations surfaced in a 2023 civil case brought by the Justice companies’ former chief of environmental compliance Robert Fowler. In the suit, Fowler claimed that Jay Justice blocked him from spending the money necessary to comply with environmental laws, including making court-ordered payments and repairing equipment. As a result, according to emails disclosed in the lawsuit there were at times complaints of near-daily violations of permit water requirements.
In a resignation letter and in subsequent court filings, Fowler said he was concerned the circumstances exposed him to “potential civil and criminal liability.” Fowler declined to comment.
The Justice companies denied Fowler’s accusations. The Justice companies believe the government’s criminal investigation was based primarily on Fowler’s claims, which Ruby dismissed as the allegations of a “disgruntled” former employee.
Last month, a jury in Alabama found that the Justice companies had made false representations to Fowler about his role, but it did not award him the millions of dollars in damages he demanded in his lawsuit. The judge has yet to enter his final ruling.
In the DOJ’s aborted investigation of Southern Coal, prosecutors and federal agents had begun to gather evidence, scrutinizing testimony in the Justices’ various civil trials, and had approached former employees seeking information. Government attorneys also sent subpoenas seeking further documentation, said those familiar with the probe, a move that was opposed by the company’s lawyers.
People familiar with the case said Justice Department attorneys were ready to fight the Justices’ lawyers over the subpoenas.
But before they could move forward, Blanche’s office shut it down.
The post Trump Administration Killed Criminal Investigation of GOP Senator’s Coal Companies appeared first on ProPublica.
Kara Meredith can tell you the exact day her life turned upside down: Aug. 23, 2025.
She was at her home in Fort Gibson, Oklahoma, caring for her 5-week-old son, when one of her daughters ran to tell her there was water all over the bathroom floor. Her husband, Mitch Meredith, wasn’t worried — until he saw the dark liquid bubbling up around the base of the bathtub. Mitch and his relatives worked all night trying to contain it. It was near dawn when his uncle said, “This is oil.”
The United States is the largest oil and gas producer in the world. All of that drilling produces hundreds of billions of gallons of toxic wastewater each year. For decades, energy companies have disposed of that briny fluid by shooting it back underground using high-pressure injection wells. But across Oklahoma, the fluid is spreading uncontrollably belowground, blasting out of old, unplugged wells, polluting land and contaminating drinking water.
In a new documentary from The Frontier and ProPublica, reporter Nick Bowlin investigates a scourge of oil field wastewater seeping into the lives of Oklahomans, about half of whom live within a mile of an oil and gas operation.
His reporting takes him to the headquarters of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, the state agency tasked with regulating oil and gas. The agency told Bowlin that it is committed to “doing the right thing, holding operators accountable, protecting Oklahoma and its resources, and providing fair and balanced regulation.” But as Bowlin continues to dig, he discovers he is far from the first one to raise the alarm about what’s happening in Oklahoma.
Watch the documentary here.
We’ve reported on oil and gas pollution contaminating drinking water, killing cattle and damaging property. We need your help to show how this affects people across the state.
The post Toxic Ground: How Oil Field Pollution Is Threatening Oklahoma appeared first on ProPublica.
Acumen Cyber has announced a strategic partnership with AttackIQ to help organizations continuously validate their cyber defenses against real-world threats and reduce exposure to modern attacks.
The partnership combines Acumen Cyber’s engineering-led security operations expertise with AttackIQ’s Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) platform. Together, the companies aim to help organizations identify exploitable attack paths, validate security controls, and prioritize remediation efforts based on actual risk rather than theoretical vulnerabilities.
Moving beyond traditional vulnerability management
As cybercriminals increasingly leverage artificial intelligence and automation, organizations are struggling to keep pace with the growing volume of vulnerabilities and security alerts.
According to Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ, traditional approaches centered on vulnerability counts, severity ratings, and periodic assessments are no longer enough. Security teams need continuous visibility into how attackers could move through their environments and whether existing controls are capable of stopping them.
The partnership is designed to help organizations continuously test defensive effectiveness, validate security investments, and focus resources on the attack paths that present the greatest risk.
Carl Wright, Chief Commercial Officer at AttackIQ, said many organizations are overwhelmed by security findings but still lack clarity about where they are truly vulnerable.
“Threat Debt changes the conversation from managing lists of vulnerabilities to understanding and reducing accumulated adversary opportunity,” Wright said.
Continuous validation becomes a priority
As part of the partnership, Acumen Cyber’s engineers will emulate real-world adversary techniques mapped to frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK. This will allow organizations to test whether their preventive and detective controls can successfully stop modern attack methods.
The companies say the approach helps uncover where vulnerabilities, identity exposures, misconfigurations, and control gaps combine to create viable attack paths to critical assets.
Mark Robertson, CEO of Acumen Cyber, said organizations need to focus less on activity metrics and more on measurable security outcomes.
“Most organizations still operate security programs built around activity metrics instead of validated outcomes,” Robertson said. “The reality is that adversaries exploit paths, not isolated findings.”
He added that the partnership will enable customers to continuously identify attacker opportunities and systematically reduce what AttackIQ calls “Threat Debt” before those weaknesses can be exploited.
Measuring exposure through Threat Debt
A key component of the partnership is the AttackIQ Threat Debt Index, which provides organizations with a framework for measuring accumulated adversary opportunity across their environments.
The index is designed to track how attack paths change over time, identify where new exposure has emerged, and show where security controls are successfully reducing risk. This gives organizations a way to measure cyber resilience based on validated outcomes rather than simply reporting on security activities.
As organizations continue to face increasingly sophisticated cyber threats, Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ believe continuous validation and threat-informed defense will play a growing role in helping security teams stay ahead of attackers.
The post Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation appeared first on IT Security Guru.
Sabato 11 dicembre 2021 alle ore 17:00
a seguire dalle 19:00 acheritivo e live music by unit electric assembly
unit hacklab @zam via sant'abbondio 4, milano
Accedi
